tv The Last Word With Lawrence O Donnell MSNBC April 19, 2019 7:00pm-8:00pm PDT
just to recap something that happened on our air this hour, democratic presidential candidate and massachusetts senator elizabeth warren tonight becoming the first 2020 presidential candidate and she's a leading candidate to call for impeachment proceedings to begin in the house specifically on the basis of the evidence produced in the mueller report about the president and obstruction of justice. elizabeth warren is not the kind of candidate who would build a campaign around this. this is not the way she has been campaigning thus far. she says she told me here on the air she came to that revelation after reading all the way through the report and finding evidence overwhelming. that does it for us tonight. we'll see you again on monday. it's time for the last worded with lawrence o'donnell. >> good evening, rachel. i was riveted to that interview. you took elizabeth warren through every question that we're all wondering about how
did she come to this position, which she had already tweeted i think earlier today. >> this afternoon. >> she got out there right away and then that hypothetical you gave her about if you could see into the future and actually know that this process of impeachment would be actually politically harmful for democrats. >> that it wouldn't result in him being removed. >> wouldn't result in him being removed. in other words, a clinton version of impeachment is it worth doing and her answer to that was so powerful. >> solidly yes. it's the right thing to do because it's the right thing to do. let the chips fall where they may. it's interestinging to -- you and i cover these guys and know all these candidates not only for how they're running but how they have campaigned and the kinds of people they are. i would not have expected that warren would be the one coming out and saying impeachment is the right thing to do.
it's so distant from the campaign she's running but she made a case she's moved by the evidence. and you've got to stand up and say this is wrong. it will be interesting if others follow. >> she turned every page of that report and you just don't see this the same way you saw it before you started reading it. that's true for all of us reading it. >> i felt that way myself. >> thank you, appreciate it. >> well, at the end of had hour tonight, we're going to show you something that many of you might already know about, and that is that sarah sanders was caught lying in the mueller report. she's actually in the mueller report where she is exposed as a liar in the mueller report, lying in the president briefing room something you've already known that she does and does pretty much every time she shows up there. but there's something about what she actually said to the mueller investigators that has been mostly overlooked and possibly entirely overlooked in the glee
generally that's out there in the news media about sarah sanders having to admit to the mueller investigators that she wasn't telling the truth. something she does every day. here's the thing. in admitting to the mueller investigators that she lied, she actually lied about her lie. and we will show you that. we will show you proof of her lying about her lie on video at the end of this hour. it's one of the minor points of the mueller report and so we're going to save it till the end of the hour. you really want to see this. there's a detail not explored by the people pointing it out today. we'll get to that at the end of the hour. there is so much more to cover before that. attorney general william barr today insulted congress after insulting america's intelligence yesterday. by telling us that president
trump fully cooperated with the mueller investigation an hour and a half before we began reading the hundreds of pages of ways in which president trump did not cooperate with the investigation. refused to speak to the investigators, and repeatedly fired the special prosecutor. the mueller report shows clearly that president trump fired robert mueller. more than once. and the own reason robert mueller kept working on the case is that the person donald trump ordered to fire robert mueller didn't do it. but in donald trump's mind, he definitely fired robert mueller. the mueller report volume 2 page 85. on saturday june 17th, 2017, the president called mcgahn and directed him 0 have the special counsel removed. mcgahn was at home. and the president was at camp david. in interviews with this office, mcgahn recalled that the president called him at home twice and on both occasions directed him to call rosenstein and say that mueller home run
conflicts that precluded him from serving as special counsel of. on the first call, mcgahn recalled that the president said something like, you got to do this. you got to call rod. mcgahn said he told the president that he would see what he could do. mcgahn was perturbed by the call and did not intend to act on the request. when the president called mcgahn a second time to follow up on the order to call the department of justice, mcgahn recalled that the president was more direct saying something like, call rod, tell rod that mueller has conflicts and can't be the special counsel. mcgahn recalled the president telling him mueller has to go. call me back when you do it. mcgahn understood the president to be saying that the special counsel had to be removed by rosenstein. to end the conversation with the president, mcgahn left the president with the impression that mcgahn would call rosenstein. mcgahn recalled had he already said no to the president's request and he was worn down.
so he just wanted to get off the phone. and so donald trump fired robert mueller. and robert mueller stayed on the job. william barr knew that that passage was in the mueller report when he told us yesterday thatond cooperated fully with the mueller investigation. today it was congress' turn to be directly insulted by william barr. democratic congressional leaders immediately turned down barr's offer to them that they alone be able to see some of the redacted material in the mueller report. the chairman of the house judiciary committee which has jurisdiction over impeachment immediately and correctly according to all congressional precedent refused. >> i've been invited to read the less redacted version of the report on condition that we take no notes and tell nobody about what we read.
what's the point of that? congress is a collective body. and if i read something and i can't tell the other committee members about it or the other members of congress, it's useless. that's frankly it's insulting to congress. we will work to have an accommodation with the attorney general. but in terms of seeing the rest of the report. and the underlying documents but it cannot be under such restrictions that we cannot function. that's why we need the subpoena. >> and after that, chairman nadler subpoenaed the full unredacted mueller report. the justice department reacted saying congressman nadler's subpoena is premature and unnecessary. everything the attorney general has done with the mueller report has been designed to delay congress's ability to deal with the mueller report. the attorney general used the first month of the mueller report's life to have complete the redaction process while
making multiple public be statements that completely mischaracterize the mueller report has being favorable to the president. then the attorney general released the redacted report on the eve of passover knowing that congress was out of town for two weeks on the easter recess. that means william barr could not be scheduled to testify to the house and senate about the mueller report until the first week of may. and now it is very likely that william barr already fight the house judiciary committee's subpoena for the full report in court and that means it could take several months or even the rest of the trump presidency for the judiciary committee to obtain the full unredacted report through that subpoena. the attorney general knew that his positive spin of the mueller report had an expiration date. he always knew that his positive spin on the mueller report would not survive the first hour of people actually reading even the
redacted version of the mueller report. but now the attorney general knows the only trump protecting tactic he has left is delay. but some members of congress have already read enough of the mueller report, presidential candidate senator elizabeth warren said this tonight. with rachel maddow. if you could see into the future and that's how it would go, the house says yes, senate says no, would you still think it was the right thing to do for the country and it was a worthy use of resources and time? >> yes, i would. i think that each person has to stand up and be counted in a democracy. i think that's why we're elected. to the house and to the senate. and there are times when it's beyond politics when it is a point of principle. to stand up and say no president can do this. >> senator warren earlier today had issued a statement, a tweet actually saying that she favored impeachment of the president and appeared with rachel tonight to
explain her position. favoring impeachment of the president. two other presidential candidates supported impeachment today. >> i think it would be perfectly reasonable for congress to open up those proceedings. it's clear that bob mueller in his report left that in the hands of congress. >> should the house pursue. >> i'll leave that to the house. that's for congress to work out. i'm pretty sure he deserves to impeached but congress will have to figure out what to do. >> the house judiciary committee has jurisdiction over impeachment and the chairman is planning a series of hearings which he's not ready over to call impeachment hearings. >> we will have major hearings and barr -- we will call a mot of other people. we'll see who they are. and we will get to the bottom of this and we will educate the country as to what went on. >> leading off our discussion tonight, two democratic members of the house judiciary
committee. the committee that has jurisdiction over impeachment. congresswoman madeleine dean of pennsylvania, and congressman lew correa of california. thank you both for joining us tonight. we've been speaking to members of your committee all week because i saw basically what was going to happen to you, that this was going to be handed in effect to your committee and the pressure was going to be on how to address the impeachment question. congresswoman dean, i'd like to get your reaction to what you heard elizabeth warren saying tonight. >> well, it's certainly -- it certainly is taking the temperature of where we are in this country and the gravity of this moment. and the gravity of the terrible things that are revealed in the redacted report. imagine what we haven't seen in that which is redacted. and it reminds me of one line that mueller says in this report very, very clearly. no man in this country is so high that he is above the law. that is the place where we are
in this country. there's tremendous evidence of obstruction of justice by this president. and i think robert mueller very carefully said that while he will respect i suppose the decision by the department of justice not to prosecute a president in office, criminal investigation can go forward. that's what the house judiciary will do, take a look at talk to attorney general barr who has proven himself not to be an independent voice and we will also talk to mr. mueller whom i'm very much looking forward to speaking with. >> congresswoman dean is, there really any point to a hearing with attorney general barr? >> absolutely. i think it's critical that we fully reveal the conflict that mr. barr is under. he began his tenure by offering the president a false notion that he was exonerated. and had that message tweeted out and talked out throughout the
country over the course of the last month. he mischaracterized this report gravely and he knew it. he came to legal conclusions that are faulty. i think he needs to be held accountable. he is the highest law enforcement officer of our country. supposed to be independent of this president. and, of course, he's done nothing but be dependent upon this president and try to hold up the president or cover over distract and distort what actually has been investigated and uncovered in this critical report. >> congressman correa, you heard elizabeth warren earlier tonight with rachel say that she started reading the report yesterday. by the time she finished it, she is decided late last night she decided that the president should be impeached. that your committee should be begin impeachment hearings. is that your view? >> well, what i my view is when i go out into my district i find people very confused and they
ask me, what is going on? we don't know who to believe. one day the president says exoneration, just this morning he said that the mueller report was my words, a bunch of lies. separation of powers, it's our responsibility and congress and judiciary to tell people to do the oversight to let people know what exactly is going on in our government. let's clear up all this confusion. we start with the facts. mueller report a lot of redactions. i'm very happy that chairman nadler is calling for full complete disclosure of that report. i want to see mr. mueller come in. i want to see mr. barr come in. i want to see the people that are relevant in this investigation to talk publicly in front of our committee. you know why? because the american public deserves to have the truth. and i want to make sure this investigation by the judiciary is held in public. that's our first step.
find out what is really going on in our government. you know why? because this is country is deeply divided. people don't know who to believe. we want to do the only thing we want to do in judiciary is tell people the truth. and then based on our investigation, we'll ask the question, is impeachment it relevant? is it necessary? is it you know the thing to do at this point. but first we have he to investigate each and every fact out there. to make sure that the public knows what is going on. >> congressman correa, has chairman nadler given you committee members any sense of a timetable of when you will get to the impeachment question meaning will you have a hearing with attorney general barr, a hearing with robert mueller, perhaps a few more hearings and is there a point at the calendar, is there a number of hearings after which chairman nadler will convene the committee to the discuss the question of have they reached the impeachment threshold?
>> i think chairman nadler like all of us want to get to that question. however, given that it's every time he issues a subpoena he gets push back, i think it's going to be a challenge and it's going to be a very long time before we will get all the data all the information, all the facts in front of us, all the facts in front of the american publicing to ask that question. >> congresswoman dean, i want to ask you the same quell that rachel asked elizabeth warren which is that if the house judiciary committee were to vote articles of impeachment and if the democrats and the house of representatives were to vote in favor of impeachment and send that to the senate, would it be worth it even if the senate did not then veto convict and remove the president? >> well, absolutely. time is always right to do the right thing. it reminds me of where we are in this new congress. we have passed really important
laws. really important bills. around gun violence and some people say to me, why are you so happy about that? the senate's not going to do anything with it. why are you even bothering? we have a job to do. so investigate this president, we must. oversight we must. pass important legislation that might save lives we must. put it on the senate. we cannot sit on our hands because the senate is sitting on theirs. >> congressman correa, your constituents i think the picture you painted of your constituents and their confusion makes perfect sense. and you cleaned up what the president said today. he actually used profanity in his tweets in this extraordinary situation we're here on television we cannot actually quote what the president of the united states has said according to the conventions of this kind of television. and how much would you say what the president has to say about this is part of the confusion of your constituents?
>> i think that's center. the president seems to you know, move in different directions every other day. i think that's what's confusing. people not only in my district but throughout this country. you asked earlier how fast should we get to this question. we need to ask this question as quickly as possible as quickly as we can get the evidence in front of us to make the case. but remember, also, a bigger question in front of us, as well which is a foreign government meddling in our democratic elections in this country. and this can happen again in a year. in one year, in about a year, we're going to be voting again. and what is the message are we going to send to russia, to china, to iran, to north koreaing about meddling in our elections? this is an important question because this is confidence in our democracy. this is what we're talking about. and we need to make sure we get to that question, as well. we need to look at those facts.
the evidence behind russian meddling in the 2016 election and moving forward, as well. >> robert mueller's case against the president, go ahead, congresswoman. >> i wanted to echo something that my colleague lou just talked about which is what are our constituents saying and feeling. i was at our local barber shop today talking to friends and constituents there. i have to say there is such a confusion but you know what? as a result of beginning to see the parameters of this report and the grave details of it, three people in a row said to me please, get at the truth. get at the truth. our democracy is at stake. you have a job to do. so they are not being fooled by an attorney general who tries to paper over or redact over the very wrongdoing and the obstruction of justice by this president and the administration. they're getting some clarity on it. even though the president would not like them to. >> and you are both members. >> madeleine, you're absolutely
right. you're absolutely right. we need to get to the truthing in front of the public. that's why the judiciary committee our investigations our hearings are so important. >> that's where we're going to having to leave it for this segment. congresswoman madeleine dean, lou correa, members of the all-important house judiciary committee. you too along with your colleagues have the responsibility to consider the issue of impeachment. thank you very much for joining us tonight. please come back in the future. we really appreciate it. >> thanks, lawrence. >> thank you. when we come back, much of the focus has been on the obstruction of justice portion of the mueller report. that is only half of the mueller report. part one volume one of the mueller report tells the story of the russian attack on our election and trump contacts with russia, trump family contacts with russia, trump campaign contacts with russia.
how much in that portion of the mueller report is possible fuel for impeachment. rt is possible for impeachment. jardiance asks... when it comes to type 2 diabetes, are you thinking about your heart? well, i'm managing my a1c, so i should be all set. actually, you're still at risk for a fatal heart attack or stroke. that's where jardiance comes in. it reduces the risk of dying from a cardiovascular event for adults who have type 2 diabetes and known heart diseas. that's why the american diabetes association recommends the active ingredient in jardiance. and it lowers a1c?
with diet and exercise. jardiance can cause serious side effects including dehydration, genital yeast or urinary tract infections, and sudden kidney problems. ketoacidosis is a serious side effect that may be fatal. a rare, but life-threatening, bacterial infection in the skin of the perineum could occur. stop taking jardiance and call your doctor right away if you have symptoms of this bacterial infection, ketoacidosis, or an allergic reaction. do not take jardiance if you are on dialysis or have severe kidney problems. taking jardiance with a sulfonylurea or insulin may cause low blood sugar. so, what do you think? now i feel i can do more to go beyond lowering a1c. ask your doctor about jardiance today.
now i feel i can do more to go beyond lowering a1c. you know reliable support when you have it, and that dependability is what we want to give our customers. at comcast, it's my job to constantly monitor our network. prevent problems, and to help provide the most reliable service possible. my name is tanya, i work in the network operations center for comcast. we are working to make things simple, easy and awesome. most of the discussion of impeachment in the last 24 hours has concentrated on volume 2 of the mueller report about the president's obstruction of justice. but there is more than enough in volume 1 of the mueller report to produce articles of
impeachment. this is in volume 1 of the mueller report. >> russia, if you're listening, i hope you're able to find the 30,000e mails that are missing. >> as it turns out, russia was listening and according to the mueller report, within approximately five hours of trump's statement, gru officers targeted for the first time clinton's personal office. then as president, donald trump has repeated lid lied to the world about the russian attack on our election. . >> president putin really feels and he feels strongly that he did not meddle in our election. they said they think it's russia. i have president putin. he just said it's not russia. i will say this. i don't see any reason why it would be. >> that man took an oath to defend the constitution against all enemies foreign and
domestic. and he has not lived up to that oath. for one day of his presidency. joining us now su jonathan alter, columnist for the daily beast, he has reported on every presidential race since 1980 and richard stengel former undersecretary of state in the obama administration. both msnbc political analysts. rick, i want to start with you on volume 1 of the mueller report which has so much about the russian contacts with the trump campaign that we didn't know before. the obstruction of justice part is i think is the part that most people are able to grasp most easily as possible fuel for impeachment. but there's a lot in the volume 1. >> mueller says there are basically three ways ha russia tried to infiltrate the trump campaign one through messaging, one through the gru hacking the dnc and leaking e mails to the trump campaign and one through all the contacts including the trump tower meeting and the meetings about moscow.
i have to say having gone through the indictments that mueller did already of the 13 russians of the ira and the gru, there's a lot there that actually wasn't in the final report. in fact, i was quite surprised that it didn't turn out to be more connections. in fact, the reason they didn't really collude in the sense that we thought they were bass basically because of incompetence on both sides. the russians were the c team. the trump people are the d team and they couldn't really figure it out together. the messaging part which was fascinating is the russians never came clean. remember they will pretended to be americans. they talked to trump campaign officials about producing rallies and messaging. they were retweeted by people like kellyanne conway and donald trump jr. but they never came out from behind their masks or revealed that they were russians. for the most part, the trump people didn't seem to realize they were. >> jonathan, they seem to have done quite enough using paul manafort's detailed polling
information where they needed help in which electoral college states in the midwest. >> paul manafort was colluding with the russians, full stop. if you're giving them polling information and information about where to target their efforts. it's important to understand that mueller never said they didn't include. he actually has a paragraph about collusion saying this isn't this term is not relevant to our inquiry. we're interested in whether there was a criminal conspiracy. collusion is not a legal term. volume 1 is full of collusion. it's all collusion. when trump says there was no collusion, that is flatly untrue. mueller found it was not a criminal conspiracy which is a different thing. i disagree with you a little rick, on the coordination. i thought there was a lot of sort of tacit effective fairly competent. it took them five hours after the trump clip that you showed and october 7th when trump was
on the ropes for the "access hollywood" business it took them one hour before they got the stolen e mails, wikileaks was working with the russians, wikileaks and the russians are basically the same thing. that's what we're learning. we hope i think there's some hope that with assange now being you know brought to justice maybe we can learn more about the wikileaks russian connections. >> let's listen to what elizabeth warren had to say tonight about her decision to support impeachment today after reading the mueller report yesterday. >> this is about a point of principle. the report is absolutely clear that a foreign government attacked our electoral system to help donald trump. he welcomed that help. and then when it was investigated by our own federal authorities donald trump took multiple steps to try to obstruct justice. you know, this is one of those
moments when i get it that there are people who think politically no, it's going to be too hard to do this. this isn't about politics. isn't even specifically about donald trump himself. it is about what a president of the united states should be able to do and what the role of congress is in saying no, a president does not get to come in and stop an investigation about a foreign power that attacked this country or an investigation about his own wrongdoing. equal justice under law. no one is above the law and that includes the president of the united states. it is the constitutional responsibility of congress to follow through on that. >> in your careers as journalists you've both covered a lot of presidential campaigns. we've never seen one where one of the campaign issues is should my opponent the president of the united states, be impeached.
>> go ahead. >> i mean, full stop it's the greatest scandal in american history. whether trump and russia colluded or not, russia attacked the american system. the president of the united states principal job is to defend america against foreign attacks. not only he did not defend us and not criticize us, is he leaving the country open to continued attacks by russia which are happening right now even while we speak. >> he in effect joined the other side on this attack. >> there's no smoking gun? there's a smoking ar artillery range. everything in this report indicates an impeachable offense. and i think that she's right not only on a matter of principle. i think she's right politically, as well and that the conventional wisdom that somehow there's going to being this backlash against democrats if they connect the dots and the senate trial i just think is wrong. you know, these reports are hard for the american people to have
absorb. they're busy. they need to see the movie not just read the book. and somebody has to put on a show which is what a trial is even if the republicans vote against it, i think it will be hard for the republicans to defend having defended donald trump at a senate trial. >> at the same time, rick, attorney general is doing everything he can doing to delay the way jerry nadler and the committee would like to proceed and what he knows he's doing is he's delaying the possibility of impeachment. >> well, and i would say the same thing in a sense about the attorney general as i said about the president. the attorney general's job to be the attorney general for all the people. he's being the defense lawyer for donald trump. what he said just before in his preview was not subjectively wrong, it was objectively false and untrue. i think he's betraying the american people in the same way. >> rick stengel, jonathan alter, thank you both. when we come back, there are still some mysteries inside the
mueller report including a dozen criminal referrals that we did not know about until we read that report yesterday. that's next. until we read that report yesterday. that's next. (burke) at farmers, we've seen almost everything, so we know how to cover almost anything. even rooftop parking. strange forces at work? only if you're referring to gravity-and we covered it. talk to farmers. we know a thing or two because we've seen a thing or two. ♪ we are farmers. bum-pa-dum, bum-bum-bum-bum ♪ woman 1: this is my body of proof. man 1: proof of less joint pain and clearer skin. man 2: proof that i can fight psoriatic arthritis... woman 2: ...with humira. woman 3: humira targets and blocks a specific source of inflammation that contributes to both joint and skin symptoms. it's proven to help relieve pain, stop further irreversible
joint damage and clear skin in many adults. humira is the number one prescribed biologic for psoriatic arthritis. announcer: humira can lower your ability to fight infections. serious and sometimes fatal infections, including tuberculosis, and cancers, including lymphoma, have happened, as have blood, liver, and nervous system problems, serious allergic reactions, and new or worsening heart failure. tell your doctor if you've been to areas where certain fungal infections are common and if you've had tb, hepatitis b, are prone to infections, or have flu-like symptoms or sores. don't start humira if you have an infection. man 3: ask your rheumatologist about humira. woman 4: go to mypsaproof.com to see proof in action.
e. that handles anything. that protects what's important. and reaches everywhere. this is beyond wifi. this is xfi. simple, easy, awesome. at the end of the mueller report, there is an indication that more indictments are coming. in appendix d it says "during the course of the investigation, the office period clid identified evidence of potential criminal activity that was outside the scope of the special counsel's jurisdiction, established by the acting attorney general." after consultation with the office of the deputy attorney
general, the office referred that evidence to appropriate law enforcement authorities principally other components of the department of justice and the fbi. those referrals listed alphabetically by subject are summarized below. and then what is below is redacted. the report lists 14 referrals by robert mueller to other offices. only two of those referrals were publicly known before the release of the report. the other 12 referrals are redacted in the report under the category of preventing harm to an ongoing matter. the mueller report says that in deciding whether or not to prosecute individuals the office spf considered whether the individuals were subject to effective prosecutioning in another jurisdiction." so tonight, congress is wondering about how many of those cases vox donald trump and how many of those cases might involve more impeachable
offenses by donald trump. we'll consider that next. offenses by donald trump we'll consider that next hey, who are you? oh, hey jeff, i'm a car thief... what?! i'm here to steal your car because, well, that's my job. what? what?? what?! (laughing) what?? what?! what?! [crash] what?! haha, it happens. and if you've got cut-rate car insurance, paying for this could feel like getting robbed twice. so get allstate... and be better protected from mayhem... like me.
♪ for people 50 and older colat average risk.ing honey have you seen my glasses? i've always had a knack for finding things... colon cancer, to be exact. and i find it noninvasively... no need for time off or special prep. it all starts here... you collect your sample, and cologuard uses the dna in your stool to find 92% of colon cancers. you can always count on me to know where to look. oh, i found them! i can do this test now! ask your doctor if cologuard is right for you. covered by medicare and most major insurers.
yesss, i'm doing it all. the water. the exercise. the fiber. month after month, and i still have belly pain and recurring constipation. so i asked my doctor what else i could do, and i said yesss to linzess. linzess treats adults with ibs with constipation or chronic constipation. linzess is not a laxative, it works differently. it helps relieve belly pain and lets you have more frequent and complete bowel movements. do not give linzess to children less than 6, and it should not be given to children 6 to less than 18, it may harm them. do not take linzess if you have a bowel blockage. get immediate help if you develop unusual or severe stomach pain, especially with bloody or black stools. the most common side effect is diarrhea, sometimes severe. if it's severe, stop taking linzess and call your doctor right away. other side effects include gas, stomach area pain, and swelling. i'm still doing it all. the water. the exercise. the fiber. and i said yesss to linzess for help with belly pain and recurring constipation.
ask your doctor. i think what we need to do is really take some time to let settle in the seriousness of what mueller has set out in this almost a dozen acts or courses of conduct that could amount to obstruction of justice. and determine what the right course is. we certainly need to continue the investigative work to determine are there other ways
this president is compromised or are there other offenses that rise to the level of removal from office. >> joining our discussion now, adam classfeld, from courthouse news covering the release of the mueller report and lisa graves and a former staff member of the senate judiciary committee. thank you both for joining us on this friday night. adam, i'll start with you. the speculation there has been some speculation what are these 12 redacted referrals that we had no knowledge of before we read the mueller report. this is exactly the kind of thing you've been studying. > right. thank you for having me, lawrence. one thing that you mentioned a little bit earlier was that this list is alphabetical. there are two public names, one of those public names is michael cohen and the other public name is gregory craig. and between them there are two redactions. there are two other people. and here's where i believe some of the biggest bombshells in the mueller report come in the
footnotes. one footnote happens with a person named robert costello who was a back channel to rudy giuliani described in the press. now, he was described in the mueller report as being the one who told cohen sleep well tonight. you have friends in high places. and that was right after the raid. if you look at the footnote after that quotation, that it's cited to a redacted footnote and it says harm to ongoing matter. now, make of that what you will but it says that whatever that e mail communicated is something that is ongoing. and that's being looked into. >> and the implications of that e mail were that the president would take care of michael cohen possibly pardon somehow he would take care of him. and again, it goes to the obstruction of justice issue. >> that's what the report went into. that's what they -- the report
explicitly states that michael cohen had believed that this was if he stays in line, if he stays on message, that he will be taken care of. he has friends in high places. >> lisa graves we have some breaking news at this hour from don mcgahn actually from his lawyer. don mcgahn was attacked by rudy giuliani in some of rudy giuliani's public comments because don mcgahn may be the single most devastating witness against donald trump in the mueller report. don mcgahn, white house counsel taking notes in virtually all of his conversations with the president, don mcgahn was given the orders to fire the special prosecutor. he wouldn't do it. don mcgahn is possibly as i said the the most important source in the mueller report. of course, rudy giuliani starred attacking him. and tonight, don mcgahn's lawyer william burck issued a statement saying it's a mystery why rudy
giuliani feels the needed to relit dait gate the attorney general and deputy attorney general have concluded were not obstruction but they are accurately described in the report. don nevertheless appreciates that the president gave him the opportunity to be as white house counsel and assist him with his signature accomplishments. and so here we have now the first public crack in the mcgahn wall. >> well, what you see there is him trying to have it both ways in a way. i actually think don mcgahn came out of the report looking very cooperative, very concerned about the president's lawlessness. and now you have a statement of him basically suggesting he stands by the idea that there was no obstruction. i think that's false but also what you see in that statement by don mcgahn is that in fact, a lot of these republicans are hanging their hat on the fact that this president has stacked the u.s. supreme court that that's sort of the rationale behind standing behind him. i think that's one of the things don mcgahn sa an alewding to in
his statement. >> adam also for mcgahn, he's the one in the report who says that the president was always trying to get him to do crazy crap. he had to clean that up for tv. and so mcgahn's characterizations of the president are absolutely devastating. >> and that's why we saw the president go this morning dwighting about note takers. he was very irate about note takers. one of those note takers according to the report is don mcgahn. >> yeah, and lisa, the president says to don mcgahn at a certain point, i never had a lawyer who took notes. mcgahn says to him well now you have a real one. it turns out michael cohen did a lot more than take notes. we've heard at least one recording of michael cohen's conversations with donald trump. >> that's right. it's astonishing what donald trump's perceptions of lawyers is. he's obviously shape by one of the most corrupt lawyers of the 20th century.
his lawyer roy cohn who was ultimately disbarred. that's his hero. in essence that's who he's trying to make attorney general barr into. barr seems to be willing to play the role of donald trump's roy cohn. but fortunately for us, don mcgahn was not and ultimately michael cohen was not willing to play that role to the end of the theater of donald trump. >> lisa graves, adam thank you both for joining us tonight. when we come back, the mueller report's revelationing about sarah sanders having to admit to them finally she had to admit to someone that she lied. o admit to someone that she lied. does this map show the peninsula trail? you won't find that on a map. i'll take you there. take this left. if you listen real hard you can hear the whales.
oop. you hear that? (vo) our subaru outback lets us see the world. sometimes in ways we never imagined. itso chantix can help you quit "slow turkey." along with support, chantix is proven to help you quit. with chantix you can keep smoking at first and ease into quitting. chantix reduces the urge so when the day arrives, you'll be more ready to kiss cigarettes goodbye. when you try to quit smoking, with or without chantix, you may have nicotine withdrawal symptoms. stop chantix and get help right away if you have changes in behavior or thinking, aggression, hostility,
depressed mood, suicidal thoughts or actions, seizures, new or worse heart or blood vessel problems, sleepwalking, or life-threatening allergic and skin reactions. decrease alcohol use. use caution driving or operating machinery. tell your doctor if you've had mental health problems. the most common side effect is nausea. quit smoking "slow turkey." talk to your doctor about chantix. you wouldn't accept from any one else. why accept it from your allergy pills? flonase relieves your worst symptoms including nasal congestion, which most pills don't. flonase helps block 6 key inflammatory substances. most pills only block one. flonase. we need a solution.ut their phones down. introducing... smartdogs. the first dogs trained to train humans. stopping drivers from: liking. selfie-ing. and whatever this is.
"the washington post" is reporting that the president is livid tonight about the people who work for him or used to work for him who decided not to lie for him to robert mueller's investigators. sarah sanders is not one of those people. sarah sanders did lie to robert mueller's team. when sarah sanders spoke to the special prosecutor's team, she didn't tell them the truth, even when she was explaining why she lied about the fbi in a white house press briefing she actually lied to them about why
she lied. you have probably already heard today that she was caught lying and exposed as a liar in the mueller report, but there's more to it. she actually lied to the mueller investigation about her lie. we will show you the video proof of that next. of that next ♪ corey is living with metastatic breast cancer, which is breast cancer that has spread to other parts of her body. she's also taking prescription ibrance
with an aromatase inhibitor, which is for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive her2- metastatic breast cancer as the first hormonal based therapy. ibrance plus letrozole was significantly more effective at delaying disease progression versus letrozole. patients taking ibrance can develop low white blood cell counts, which may cause serious infections that can lead to death. before taking ibrance, tell your doctor if you have fever, chills, or other signs of infection, liver or kidney problems, are pregnant, breastfeeding, or plan to become pregnant. common side effects include low red blood cell and low platelet counts, infections, tiredness, nausea, sore mouth, abnormalities in liver blood tests, diarrhea, hair thinning or loss, vomiting, rash, and loss of appetite. corey calls it her new normal because a lot has changed, but a lot hasn't. ask your doctor about ibrance. the #1 prescribed fda-approved oral combination treatment for hr+/her2- mbc. oral combination treatment liberty mutual customizes your car insurance, hmm. exactly.
so you only pay for what you need. nice. but, uh... what's up with your... partner? not again. limu that's your reflection. only pay for what you need. ♪ liberty, liberty, liberty, liberty ♪ if you have moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, every day can begin with flakes. it's a reminder of your struggles with psoriasis. but what if your psoriasis symptoms didn't follow you around? that's why there's ilumya. with just 2 doses, a majority of people were clear or almost clear. and over time, even more people were clear or almost clear. all with dosing 4 times a year... after 2 initial doses. plus, ilumya was shown to have similar risks of infections compared to placebo. don't use if you are allergic to ilumya or any of its ingredients. before starting treatment, your doctor should check for tuberculosis and infections. after checking there is no need for routine lab monitoring unless your doctor advises it. ilumya may increase your risk of infections and lower your ability to fight them.
tell your doctor if you have an infection or have symptoms, or if you plan to or have recently received a vaccine. this could be your chance to leave your psoriasis symptoms behind. ask your doctor for ilumya today, for a clearer tomorrow. ♪ it is not news that sarah sanders is a pathological liar who works for a pathological liar. that is why as a general rule i do not use video of sarah sanders speaking at white house
press briefings. i don't let this program become a delivery system for trumpian propaganda, which is the only thing that sarah sanders traffics in whenever she speaks, wherever she speaks. many mueller report readers have been just delighted to find that when sarah sanders was in effect under oath speaking to robert mueller's investigators, she was forced to admit that she lied. but that's not exactly what happened. remember, sarah sanders is not just a liar, she is a pathological liar. so when she was admitting to the mueller investigators that she didn't tell the truth, she actually lied to them and they knew it. they knew that many of the people they interviewed lied to them. in fact, the mueller report specifies that, quote, several individuals lied to the office of the special counsel, which is a crime, and they decided that not all of those lies were worth
prosecuting. the mueller report says, quote, the office charged some of those lies as violations of the federal false-statements statute. sarah sanders is one of the liars the mueller team decided not to charge under the federal false-statements statute. page 72 of volume two of the mueller report catches sarah sanders in the kinds of lies that she tells every day. sarah sanders spoke to the president about his decision to fire comey and then spoke to reporters in a televised press conference. sanders told reporters that the president, the department of justice and bipartisan members of congress had lost confidence in comey, and, most importantly, the rank and file of the fbi had lost confidence in their director. accordingly, the president accepted the recommendation of his attorney general to remove
james comey from his position. in response to questions from reporters, sanders said that rosenstein decided on his own to review comey's performance and that rosenstein decided on his own to come to the president on monday, may 8th, to express his concerns about comey. she was lying about all of that. rosenstein did nothing on his own involving the firing of james comey. he wrote a memo that the president ordered him to write. the report continues, when a reporter indicated that the vast majority of fbi agents supported comey, sanders said, look, we've heard from countless members of the fbi that say very different things. the mueller team was composed of prosecutors and fbi agents and so they were very curious about why sarah sanders lied in her press briefing about the rank and file of the fbi losing
confidence in their director. according to the report, she told them that her statement that rank and file fbi agents had lost confidence in comey was a comment she made in the heat of the moment, it was not founded on anything. in the heat of the moment. she also told them that it was, quote, a slip of the tongue. a slip of the tongue in the heat of the moment. okay. let's see how hot that moment was when her tongue slipped. >> and secretary devos is in daytona beach, florida, to deliver the commencement address at bethune cookman university. >> that's not a mistake. that's what i meant to show you because that's what she was talking about right before she made her statement about the fbi losing confidence in james comey. she was reading a prepared
statement about trump administration news before she took any questions from anyone. there was no heat in the moment. there was no slip of the tongue. she was reading. she was reading words that she and the team of liars in the white house press office wrote in the cool comfort of their offices. >> there's also another nugget of big news as you guys may have been paying attention in regard to the termination of the former fbi director comey. the president over the last several months lost confidence in director comey. the doj lost confidence in director comey. bipartisan members of congress made it clear that they had lost confidence in director comey. and, most importantly, the rank and file of the fbi had lost confidence in their director. >> she was reading. it wasn't a slip of the tongue in the heat of the moment. that was a lie that she wrote
and then very calmly and deliberately read to the news media and to the country. the rank and file of the fbi had lost confidence in their director. and then when she was forced under oath to admit that statement wasn't true, she actually lied about her lie. to people who knew she was lying about her lie. that, that is truly pathological lying. that's tonight's last word. "the 11th hour with brian williams" starts now. >> tonight the president's sudden and dramatic u turn on the mueller report. perhaps you are old enough to remember when it totally exonerated him. today he says the information fabricated, total b-s, now vowing to, quote, bring justice to some very sick and dangerous people. plus, on the night after, what are the most striking